🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a latest court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger panel of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the legal right and justification to deploy national guard forces in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and autonomy as this case progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”